Trakehner forum at Trakehner Treffpunkt - Trakehner Meeting Place   Trakehner Treffpunkt

Reality Check II

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 24, 2012, 09:45:39 AM

Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
Visit the Trakehner Classifieds at Trakehner Treffpunkt Support Trakehner forums when you shop!--click to learn how Support Trakehner forums by making a donation Return to Trakehner Treffpunkt home
Trakehner Treffpunkt - Trakehner Meeting Place  |  General  |  General Board  |  Topic: Reality Check II 0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: « 1 2 Print
Author Topic: Reality Check II  (Read 3378 times)
acottongim
ata
Old Hand
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,435


I love Trakehners!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2008, 07:20:05 PM »

Christina... I apologize if anything that I have said offends you or is taken as that way.  Not intending to do that at all.  Yes, what you wrote initally about seeing the mares did seem to say (and we can blame it on the written word without the nuances of voice and body language to emphasise our true meanings  Smiley) that you were thinking that because the mares/stallions were approved there should not have been an issue with the resulting foals.  If that wasn't what was meant then I'm sorry.

As for breeding being a crap shoot - it is to a certain extent.  every horse is an individual.  We try to produce the best that we can by breeding the best possible mares to the best possible stallions that most compliment them in all respects, but we sometimes still fail.  That is why it is important to not just know the bloodlines for who is related to who, but also for what the lines will pass on.  To make it a "nice" comparassion (so maybe I won't get jumped on for this LOL) Anduc will put a pretty head on just about everything (not 100% of the time, but a vast majority of the time).  I can generally spot an Anduc head a mile away.  And it passes on for GENERATIONS... Compare Anduc, Hailo, Impressionist, Preston,and any of Preston's 3 foals and they all have the same head.  It blows my mind.  So obviously if you want a pretty head, that would generally be a pretty good bet right?  that is all I'm saying.

Take full brothers/sisters... they are similiar but they aren't always exactly the same right?? By all rights, if there were no other variables in breeding you would have identical horses.  But there are variables, so the resulting offspring are different.  Sometimes it is minor, sometimes it is more obvious.  My colt, Tate, is similar to Tycoon, but Tate has different movement than Tycoon - not saying one is better than the other, but Tate has more hock/knee action than Tycoon does.  Go figure.  

I hope that makes sense!
Logged

Proudly standing the approved stallion, Tatendrang.
www.emeraldacrestk.com
acottongim
ata
Old Hand
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,435


I love Trakehners!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2008, 07:22:54 PM »



The word slightly is significant.  If you wouldn't be happy reproducing a better copy of your mare, then what's the point of breeding her?  IMO at least 60% of resulting foal comes from the mare, it's even more important to apply stringent guidelines to them.  The mare is the start - dont' make the mistake of assigning "blame" to these stallions if they were bred to inadequate mares.



We were posting at the same time, but this is soooo true!  And you explained what I mean by a crap shoot much better LOL - you do everything you can and sometimes the results just don't match the expectations.
Logged

Proudly standing the approved stallion, Tatendrang.
www.emeraldacrestk.com
EspritEC
ata
FEI
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 131


I love Trakehners! What are you riding?


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #27 on: October 20, 2008, 07:57:47 AM »

I believe I'm correct that the wording that goes with the numbers for inspections is the same that dressage judges use. This is from memory so I may be slightly off but this gives you a good idea.

10 - excellent
9 - very good
8 - good
7 - fairly good
6 - satisfactory
5 - sufficient
4 - insufficient
3 - fairly bad
2 - bad
1 - very bad
0 - not executed

Of course I don't think they could use the 0??? And note that 10 doesn't stand for perfect!
Logged

Carol Poulin-Taylor
Home of Tradition *Pb*
Laurie
Novice
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


Aim High!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #28 on: October 20, 2008, 12:33:34 PM »

Ok - I'm about to go mathmatical on everyone.... Grin

I think the obvious explanation hasn't been mentioned yet:  The classic bell curve of most variable situations.  I would expect that most breeders and owners plan to keep most of what falls to the "right" of their particular bell curve/desired outcome because we hope that they will be our best breeders and competitors.  Those who do not, usually get sold.

As everyone as already stated, you hope that approved x approved = a horse that falls on the right side of the curve.  However, statistically speaking there will always be those outliers to both sides of the curve, your model mares and the ones who don't or shouldn't approve.  This curve would still happen if it was the same stallion and mare over and over again.  That's just statistics.

So I would expect that there are quite a few horses for sale in that left hand side of the bell curve....
Logged

Suzette
ata
Gold Medallist
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 443



View Profile
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #29 on: October 20, 2008, 12:46:50 PM »

...and those to the left of the bell curve are the ones that are for sale for "cheap" prices.
I don't understand why people who are looking for a "cheaply" priced horse expect to find that horse to be perfection?
Huh
You get what you pay for.....
Logged

Karousel Farms, Breeders of Fine Trakehner Sporthorses.
Laurie
Novice
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


Aim High!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #30 on: October 20, 2008, 05:01:56 PM »

I think everyone hopes for the rare, great/lucky deal and like any good shopper is going to look through the "sale rack" first.... Grin

However, as you stated, you must be prepared for the imperfections that go along with the "cheaply" priced.  However, I don't know that Christina's clients/friends? are  necessarily looking in the "cheap" category...

I have seen first hand (many times) people asking market price for a substandard horse.  But, that's the sellers prerogative in a Buyer beware market even if those of us who try to price and market responsibly disagree...

« Last Edit: October 20, 2008, 05:05:29 PM by Laurie » Logged

Joy
ata
Old Hand
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,270


I love Trakehners!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #31 on: October 20, 2008, 05:44:49 PM »

10 - excellent
9 - very good
8 - good
7 - fairly good
6 - satisfactory
5 - sufficient

I think the numbers are correct.  And isn't it interesting that we get bragging rights for "fairly good" or "satisfactory"?  The first time I saw these numbers, I was very surprised.  I do wonder, though, if the 7 for a Grand Prix horse is the same as a 7 for a training level.  Any judges here want to comment?
Logged
EclypseSporthorses
ata
Old Hand
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 994


Go The Distance


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #32 on: October 20, 2008, 10:49:46 PM »

Well, I wouldn't say that they were shopping high end...
though I wouldn't say that 10K is cheap either, not in this
market.  And they were only looking for OSB eligible, and
broke/safe.... not OSB and ready to show...so, I don't think
they were trying to get a garage sale deal...they were looking
for a fair price and willing to spend some money to invest in a
good horse with potential...not like they are not willing to spend
any money.  They are a good family, looking for a good horse to
get into the breed, willing to spend some money, though not a college fund.
Logged

"Delight yourself also in the Lord,
And He shall give you the desires of your heart."
Psalm 37:4
~*Ride-Far-Ride-Well*~
*^The Sky's the Limit^*~
TwinGates
ata
Old Hand
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,342


Performance Matters!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #33 on: October 20, 2008, 11:03:07 PM »

Quote
Well, I wouldn't say that they were shopping high end...though I wouldn't say that 10K is cheap either, not in this market.


Agree w/you the market is soft right now, but IMO, this is bargain basement for an OSB-eligible mare ready to go under saddle. It costs approx. $5k/yr to keep a horse (best case scenario), so @ this price, breeder would break even on a long yearling.

Logged

Home of the ATA & Verband-approved stallion Tzigane *Pb*
www.twingates.com
www.trakehners-international.com
EspritEC
ata
FEI
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 131


I love Trakehners! What are you riding?


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #34 on: October 21, 2008, 07:55:32 AM »

10 - excellent
9 - very good
8 - good
7 - fairly good
6 - satisfactory
5 - sufficient

I think the numbers are correct.  And isn't it interesting that we get bragging rights for "fairly good" or "satisfactory"?  The first time I saw these numbers, I was very surprised.  I do wonder, though, if the 7 for a Grand Prix horse is the same as a 7 for a training level.  Any judges here want to comment?

Through the USDF Learner Judges Program I was taught to first give a score for the horse's quality of movement as a basis to start from and then look at the requirements of the movement. So a 7 mover is a 7 mover regardless of level. Then how well is the required movement executed? You can go up or down accordingly. A 7 mover could go up in the score for a very straight centerline with a square halt on the bit with immobility or go down in the score if they are crooked, resistant in the bridle or disobedient, ie. rearing.
Logged

Carol Poulin-Taylor
Home of Tradition *Pb*
Laurie
Novice
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


Aim High!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #35 on: October 21, 2008, 10:30:25 AM »

Interesting timing...Brad wrote an article on the first page of the ATA newsletter on a very similar subject "What's My Horse Worth"....he's got some good points regarding a horse below average. 

"Let's say you have raised a horse that is below average.  Below average conformation, below average movement and athleticism, below average performance pedigree.  You want and need to sell it.  What should you do?  Answer:  sell it as soon as you can, for whatever price you can get, to someone who will not breed the horse but will take good care of it as a general pleasure mount."

Thoughts???
« Last Edit: October 21, 2008, 12:20:42 PM by Laurie » Logged

Lara, Gryphon Farm
ata
Gold Medallist
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 291


Trakehner Cowgirl


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #36 on: November 10, 2008, 05:35:56 AM »

Well, Maren - you just joined that elite group!  Good going and enjoy it, you deserve it more than anyone I know.. Grin
Logged
Lara, Gryphon Farm
ata
Gold Medallist
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 291


Trakehner Cowgirl


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #37 on: November 10, 2008, 05:45:06 AM »

amen, Kim.  I remember when a particularly good, and well-bred stallion was bred to any and all mares willing. As a result, he had lots of kids on the ground of all shapes and breeds, a real shame for the ATA. As a result, he had a reputation of throwing a number of questionable attributes. ps - this is not the stallion you must be thinking, but another CA boy.  He is a very good horse, and I don't know what happened to him, can't search him out.  His owners were well-meaning, and IMO his blood was very specical.  It happens I guess, when folks are wanting to get the most breedings for their stallion.. Huh
« Last Edit: November 10, 2008, 06:26:57 AM by Lara, Gryphon Farm » Logged
stoicfish
FEI
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 161


I love Trakehners!


View Profile
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #38 on: November 16, 2008, 07:02:12 PM »

Found this post personally interesting due to me breeding my mare for the first time this year.
Warmbloods are a registry and not a breed, therefore there is a lot of genetic variation in and among the animals. Traks have somewhat of a closed book (only thouroghbreds and arabs, right?) but there is still large phonotypical and genotypical differences among the Traks. I don't think it is a lack of quality in the animals that allows for "off" animals, but simply a high degree of genetic variation. The only way to reduce this is to breed very similar animals for several generations, and culling everything else. That would reduce the size of the bell curve but, I also think it reduces the chances of coming up with an exceptional horses/crosss. Variation and recombination might be a pain when trying to sell babies at a consistent price/profit, but it is what allows us to come up with "the one in a million". It is also the reason why other warmblood groups have results quicker, they get to use whoever, but I am guessing they also have more animals on the left of the bell curve.  Wink
But I believe (I am hugely bias, cause I love my girl) that there is a really solid product in Traks now, and even though they might not be the fad of the day, there is a lot of Trak blood in some very high end animals (the "A" in Argentinus is from his Great Grand Sire- Abglanz). Disproportionally so for the number of registered Traks out there. Sometimes fads and trends/marketing create things that are not always desirable in the near future. Whereas a quality product with intrinsic value will always have a place in the market. I believe the "reality check" is more of a marketing and perception issue than an actual quality issue. I have read many articles/interviews with experienced Hanoverian breeders that warn against breeding for just dressage or just jumping, and recommend breeding for all around athleticism and letting the exceptional animals “happen
« Last Edit: November 29, 2008, 11:55:01 PM by stoicfish » Logged
Joy
ata
Old Hand
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,270


I love Trakehners!


View Profile WWW
Re: Reality Check II
« Reply #39 on: December 01, 2008, 06:28:34 PM »

It costs approx. $5k/yr to keep a horse (best case scenario), so @ this price, breeder would break even on a long yearling.

I just noticed this as I was rereading past posts.  What are you including in that $5k/yr, Kim?  I'm in Maine, have my horses at home with lots of pasture, good hay, supplements, farrier every 6-8 weeks (depending on time of year and hoof growth), and vet when required (almost never).  I'd never be able to afford my horses if it cost me that much.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 Print 
Trakehner Treffpunkt - Trakehner Meeting Place  |  General  |  General Board  |  Topic: Reality Check II « previous next »
Jump to:  
Sponsored by Tannenwald Trakehner

Equinnovation equine marketing
Maintained by Equinnovation Equine Marketing
Shop with our sponsors - support our online Trakehner community!
Suggest this site to a friend: